|
|
UFOsBalder said Nov 9, 2007, 11:19 PM: |
||
|
On the Larry King Show this evening, a panel of several people testified about their experiences with UFOs. They were making an appearance on the program apparently in anticipation of an event in Washington, DC, this coming week, where officials and military folks from around the world will be meeting to discuss the UFO phenomenon - and to present the positive evidence that has been collected to date. What do you think of this topic? Is it a modern mythology, a technological twist on the same prerational, magical/mythic forms of thinking that have given us gods and goblins throughout the ages? Or is there something to it - something that defies reduction to naïve cultural projections? It isn't a topic that is discussed much in Integral circles. Should it be? I think it is very likely that life exists elsewhere in the universe. I would be surprised (and disappointed) if it didn't. I am less sure that any of those life forms are actually visiting us right now. I am open to the idea, but not convinced … I have not seen enough yet that would allow me to feel comfortable taking a decisive stand for it or against it. A number of years ago, I was in an unusual position that allowed me to hear testimony that probably many people haven't heard. I was working as a court reporter and was asked to transcribe a number of interviews with military officials, again in preparation for a meeting that was going to be taking place with government employees in the US capital in several months. For fun, and hoping I'm not breaking any rules here, I'm going to quote from one of the transcripts I made. I will change the names just to be safe. ~*~ COL. D: I am LD, Colonel, U.S.A.F., retired. I got a bachelor of science degree, and then the Air Force sent me to the _______ Business School to study management, and then promptly assigned me to Washington, DC. And I served in the Chief of Staff's Office for orientation, and then they put me into the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission where I became responsible for maintaining the inventory of the accountability of the nuclear weapon stockpile and involved in the security and the - you might say, auditing the manufacturing facilities and the storage facilities for all the nuclear weapons in the U.S. And while I was there, I had my first incident with UFOs, which, in mid-July, they flew over Washington, DC, and I saw my first nine UFOs. INTERVIEWER: What year was this? COL. D: It was July of 1952. And, of course, during that period of time I made a lot of contacts. I was a staff officer for the military liaison committee between the chairman of the AEC and the Secretary of Defense. And so, I became acquainted with not only the Army, Navy, and Air Force, but civilian agencies, the CIA, the National Security Agency, and other contacts which I developed. During that period of time, one of my functions was to accompany a security team, which visited all of the nuclear facilities to check on the security of weapons. And we were getting reports of visits by UFOs over the storage facilities and even some of the manufacturing facilities. And that went on continuously. Now, we found that the reports - the formal reports were few and far between, but security people were reluctant to report many of them because the protocol and the bureaucracy involved in reporting them - they just avoided reporting. Later, I was assigned to the Sandia Corporation as a military liaison, and I was involved in establishing a quality assurance program for the manufacture and the quality and the maintenance of their nuclear weapons. So we had to visit all of the manufacturing facilities such as [inaudible] and the Pantex facility, which assembled the nuclear components of [inaudible]. And so, there again, we observed the UFOs, who were very much interested in the facilities that we were visiting. But we did get constant referrals. What are all these UFOs hovering there for? And so, then, after that - this was during the 1950s, through the entire ‘50s. Then I was assigned to the United Pacific Command under Admiral Phelps during the ‘60s, and I was the officer in charge of the alternate command post involved with nuclear weapon operation planning. And during that period of time, I was - I maintained contacts with NORAD, with the SAC operations, involved [inaudible] operational plans for the use of nuclear weapons. And during this period of time, I also learned of a number of incidents which happened. And then further on I finally retired from the Air Force and joined the Boeing Company, where I was assigned to the Minute Man program where I was responsible for the configuration accounting of all the nuclear fleet, the Minute Man One, Two, and Three. And during that period of time, I also learned about incidents involving nuclear weapons. And among these incidents were a couple of nuclear weapons sent into space that were destroyed by the extraterrestrials. But in talking to various contacts throughout, they would allude to the fact that these did happen. There was - for example, the missile - a Minute Man missile was destroyed at the launch from Vandenberg Air Force Base. That's now a matter of public record. Well, the one incident, for example, was they actually photographed the UFO following the missile as it climbed into space and shining a beam of light on it, which neutralized the missile. And this was recorded. It was all hushed up. And they split up the team that observed it, but of course eventually the news came out. And it was later published, and we confirmed it… ~*~ This is just an excerpt from the interview. He also talked about a number of other incidents, some of which he witnessed firsthand. He also described the study of extraterrestrial artifacts at Los Alamos and Livermore that he knew about. He closed the interview by saying that there were quite a few people like him who were getting up in years and who were just tired of not talking about these experiences, and he believed that “sooner or later the truth will come out.” |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsMascha said Nov 9, 2007, 11:54 PM: |
||
|
I've been waiting for 20 years for this particular aspect of the truth to be widely known. It never happened. There must be millions worldwide by now who've had some direct, first-hand experience of these visitors, and yet the story still hasn't broken into mainstream consciousness. |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsmaxie said Nov 10, 2007, 12:10 AM: |
||
|
200 billion suns in our galaxy alone. A billion is a huge number. To frame it, consider a cash machine that will deliver a dollar a second 24hrs a day. It would take 11 days straight to build up a million dollars. To become a billionaire, it would take 32 years. 200 billion is a huge number. If only 1/100 of 1% of these suns might harbor life and 1/100 of 1% of that number might have developed a technological capability, and only 1/100 of 1% of those had mastered relatively local space travel, and 1/100 of 1% of those could really beat the distance thing, then there would be 200 civilizations in our galaxy alone capable of distance travel in space. |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsBalder said Nov 10, 2007, 9:30 AM: |
||
|
Hey, Mascha and Michael, I'm glad to have some company in the tinfoil hat club! |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsWill said Nov 10, 2007, 7:39 AM: |
||
|
…*they* are here…we are them…Earth is a planet where souls come into existence for the first time but I would venture a guess that many posting at zaadz have an extraterestial soul origin…where ever you see the cutting edge of cultural change that is a good indication…most are not *contracted* to be fully awake…that is not a nessisary pre-requisite…but look around and you will see their faces… |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsWill said Nov 10, 2007, 11:47 AM: |
||
|
…UFOs that are visible are considered the jalopies of the universe…and most of them belong to our government…plasma drive is a reality…our government has two space programs…one for the public and one that they are desparately trying to keep secret…landings of other beings and contact will become common place within the next generation…but first Earth will have moved up an octave…the ones responcible for abductions are not of the highest sort… |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsColin said Nov 10, 2007, 1:17 PM: |
||
|
Hey all… |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsFrans said Nov 10, 2007, 3:50 PM: |
||
|
I'm 100% with Michael on this one - the odds on us being the only “intelligent” life form are pretty much nill. |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsshaman sun said Nov 10, 2007, 11:01 PM: |
||
|
I strongly believe that there is life out there, and have a tendency to want to believe that other sentient beings have visited this planet. I'm just not sure about the lot of stories. There is tons of honest testimony - I've read about it so much over the years. Some are mistaken, some are authentically an unexplained phenomenon. That, coupled with some, and I mean some, alien abduction descriptions, make a good case for their “visitation.” Trying to take an integral perspective on this … I guess it would be cautious of me to say that if there is a sentient, intelligent life form contacting us, we will interpret it according to our own structures of consciousness, and experience as it occurs differently than another. That may go a long way to describe why alot of alien contact stories to sound purple/animalistic and mythic like in nature. It also may describe some of the pathologies that accompany this, such as narcissistic tendencies to believe your sperm is being used by the aliens to create the future hybrid race. It's a hazey line between the narcissistic, the mythic, and the authentic mystery of UFO's, aliens, or extra-dimensional beings. Whatever the case is, an integral model is definitely a big help to make things clearer. |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsMahajayne said Nov 11, 2007, 12:17 AM: |
||
|
I hesitate in sharing this - but thought it might provide another perspective and I think most of you have heard from me enough on II to know that I am very very well grounded. This is not about UFO's but about the topic of life on other planets, visitations, etc. |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsmaxie said Nov 11, 2007, 12:39 AM: |
||
|
Jayne, |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsmaxie said Nov 11, 2007, 12:52 AM: |
||
|
Jayne, |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsjikishin said Nov 11, 2007, 11:32 AM: |
||
|
Hey folks, Jayne, you asked: Has any one else ever read or heard about this? Yeh. My first meditation teacher (who I mentioned in a pm to you a while back) who had been a Jesuit in the Vatican in the 50s, was certain that his soul's origin was on/in another planet. I too was a dreamwalker in my first decade. I would include whoever interupted my outloud dream conversations in the conversation, without recall! That was pretty trippy for my parents. |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsFrans said Nov 11, 2007, 8:03 AM: |
||
|
Jayne, |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsWill said Nov 11, 2007, 10:18 AM: |
||
|
…okay…I'm et…I hope this doesn't tip the cart over…I came from a 5th D world where time is manipuable…I've had less than 10 incarnations…I was dropped off in the past and fast -forwarded so that I was prepared for this life …this is a pivotal generation and You are All a part of it…this is the changeing time…that's why you are at zaadz right?…to change the world?…this is part and parcel of the work… |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsMascha said Nov 11, 2007, 1:20 PM: |
||
|
Fascinating, Will. Can you say more? I admire you for going so far out on a limb… |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsmaxie said Nov 11, 2007, 4:51 PM: |
||
|
Mascha, Dear Ones,
Yer pal, Michael |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsMascha said Nov 11, 2007, 8:16 PM: |
||
|
Michael, there is such a keen self-awareness evident in your writing, to me it doesn't come across as pontificating and overly certain. In fact, I thoroughly enjoy the flamboyant richness you scatter like angel dust from so many different angles of this hologram we're admiring together, it inspires me to also say more (than maybe I should sometimes, hee). |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsmaxie said Nov 11, 2007, 10:26 PM: |
||
|
Dear Mascha, |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsmaryw said Nov 11, 2007, 11:39 PM: |
||
|
[teeny tiny correction dear Michael – Hans Kung has not been excommunicated; he remains a priest “in good standing” although the Vat has rescinded his authority to teach “officially Roman Catholic” theology–excuse my silly editorial spasm–now back to the more exciting speculation on UFOs, consequences, & etc ….] :-) |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsshaman sun said Nov 11, 2007, 10:22 PM: |
||
|
Hey Michael, thankyou for sharing this lovely post with us. I really appreciate your interest and knowledge on these subjects. It seems too often to be pushed aside as taboo, leaving it desparately in need of an integral interpretation. Thanks for that! |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsIs. said Nov 12, 2007, 1:30 AM: |
||
|
I always wondered why ghosts always bother people with opening windows and moving toothbrushes and appearing as cold winds, and why aliens appear as flashes of light or dots or green hazes. And why people with the “telekinesis-ability” only bother to move very small things, and only when people aren't looking. |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsBalder said Nov 12, 2007, 2:23 PM: |
||
|
Is, your posts are funny (if a tad, um, condescending). I understand your points, and think a lot of silliness goes on in these areas of the “unexplained.” Some of these so-called incidents are likely just cases of runaway imaginations – projections of fantasy on top of rationally (and conventionally) explicable events, at best. But from what I've seen, they ALL can't be “reduced” in this way. We can't say exactly what is happening in these different events, but I'm convinced that something significant is … something not explainable by appeals to magical thinking or superstition or hoaxes or whatever. |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsROD said Nov 13, 2007, 2:01 PM: |
||
|
I have seen a UFO. It was in Raleigh NC in 2004. I was doing a time-lapse shot of the Raleigh skyline from a hotel balcony with a cameraman for NBC Olympics. It was 6:30 in the morning and I was looking North-easterly and saw a blackish dot eight fingers above the horizon moving in a sine wave at incredible speed. It covered 70 degrees of my lateral field of vision in about four seconds before disappearing behind a cloud bank. It made about four complete crests and troughs of the wave. And of course the cameraman didn't see it nor was the camera pointed in that direction… Classic! |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsmaxie said Nov 15, 2007, 12:49 PM: |
||
|
Rod, |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsJuliee said Nov 12, 2007, 4:54 AM: |
||
|
Hi Everyone |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsSandra said Nov 12, 2007, 5:57 AM: |
||
|
Great thread, Bruce & all. We don't know - and cannot know at present - whether some super secret beam weapon was used to take down the Twin Towers on 9/11; but it is possible. And frankly, it is the one explanation that seems to cover all the anomalies. Bottom line is: Something is happening, there is a schedule, and the servants of the alien masters are pushing an agenda that few of us understand. They are trying to cement controls, to solidify their power base, because Something Wicked This Way Comes.Keith Seffen's WTC Collapse Folly: Not Even Wrong - Her husbands piece for further details from a physicists p.o.v. Love, Sandra |
|||
|
|
Re: UFOsIs. said Nov 12, 2007, 7:06 AM: |
||
|
“We don't know - and cannot know at present - whether some super secret beam weapon was used to take down the Twin Towers on 9/11; but it is possible.” | |||






